Re: firefox broken on arm64

Nice, I'm following PR.

Thanks!

Ronald Klop <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, 6/12/2023 à(s)
13:53:

> BTW it also fails on the official pkg build servers.
>
>
> https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=www%2Ffirefox%24&maintainer=&env=arm64&category=&flavor=
>
> Which also has a PR open:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275247 (opened by
> Jesper who is also in the cc of this mail-thread).
>
> Regards,
> Ronald.
>
>
>
> *Van:* Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
> *Datum:* woensdag, 6 december 2023 14:21
> *Aan:* Nuno Teixeira <[email protected]>
> *CC:* Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> *Onderwerp:* Re: firefox broken on arm64
>
>
>
> The only clue I see in the log is:
>
> gmake[4]: Entering directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/mozglue/build'
> mkdir -p '.deps/'
> mozglue/build/dummy.o
> /usr/local/bin/clang++15 -std=gnu++17 -o dummy.o -c [...] /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-120.0.1/mozglue/build/dummy.cpp
> In file included from Unified_cpp_mozglue_baseprofiler0.cpp:110:
> In file included from /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-120.0.1/mozglue/baseprofiler/core/platform.cpp:2492:
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-120.0.1/mozglue/baseprofiler/core/platform-linux-android.cpp:125:69: error: expected ')'
>   aRegs.mR11 = reinterpret_cast<Address>(mcontext.mc_gpregs.gp_x[11];
>                                                                     ^
> /wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/firefox-120.0.1/mozglue/baseprofiler/core/platform-linux-android.cpp:125:41: note: to match this '('
>   aRegs.mR11 = reinterpret_cast<Address>(mcontext.mc_gpregs.gp_x[11];
>                                         ^
> gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/.build/mozglue/build'
>
>
> But I have no experience in compiling Firefox on RPI4. And don't know why this ')' is missing. Maybe just a little patch is needed.
>
> Regards,
> Ronald.
>
>
>
> *Van:* Nuno Teixeira <[email protected]>
> *Datum:* woensdag, 6 december 2023 13:18
> *Aan:* Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
> *CC:* Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> *Onderwerp:* Re: firefox broken on arm64
>
> Tested on rpi4, current 1500004: Fails to build
>
> https://people.freebsd.org/~eduardo/logs/firefox-120.0.1%2C2.log
>
> Any clues?
>
> I remember compiling ok until about a month or so...
>
> Ronald Klop <[email protected]> escreveu no dia quarta, 6/12/2023 à(s)
> 09:32:
>
>> Yes, I was triggered to this issue because it is mentioned in the release
>> notes of 120.0.1.
>>
>> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/120.0.1/releasenotes/
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ronald.
>>
>>
>> *Van:* Nuno Teixeira <[email protected]>
>> *Datum:* dinsdag, 5 december 2023 21:43
>> *Aan:* Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
>> *CC:* Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>> *Onderwerp:* Re: firefox broken on arm64
>>
>> Port is at 120.0.1 (rc1) and for what I understanded in mozilla PR, patch
>> will be included in 120.0.1 release.
>> If I had the time I will apply patch and try it on rpi4.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Ronald Klop <[email protected]> escreveu no dia terça, 5/12/2023 à(s)
>> 17:39:
>>
>>> Could it be that you are experiencing this issue?
>>>
>>> Bug 1866025 - Firefox 120.0 segfaults at startup (Linux with 16KiB pages)
>>> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1866025> [1]
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Ronald.
>>>
>>> [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1866025
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Van:* Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen <[email protected]>
>>> *Datum:* zondag, 3 december 2023 11:59
>>> *Aan:* [email protected]
>>> *Onderwerp:* Re: firefox broken on arm64
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 03.12.2023 09.38, void wrote:
>>> > On Sun, Dec 03, 2023 at 08:34:21AM +0100, Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Just build firefox-esr-115.5.0_1,1  and firefox-116.0.3_1,2 the first
>>> >> runs with aslr disabled, the latter signals 4.
>>> >>
>>> >> Any suggestions on what is going on are appreciated.
>>> >
>>> > What's the uname -aKU ?
>>>
>>> FreeBSD generic 14.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 14.0-RELEASE #0
>>> releng/14.0-n265380-f9716eee8ab4: Fri Nov 10 09:12:14 UTC 2023
>>> [email protected]:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC
>>> arm64 1400097 1400097
>>>
>>>   did you build from ports or poudriere?
>>>  From ports.
>>>
>>> If the
>>> > latter, what's the /etc/make.conf contain?
>>> >
>>> > Please post sysctl -a | grep aslr
>>> >
>>>
>>> kern.elf32.aslr.shared_page: 0
>>> kern.elf32.aslr.stack: 1
>>> kern.elf32.aslr.honor_sbrk: 0
>>> kern.elf32.aslr.pie_enable: 0
>>> kern.elf32.aslr.enable: 0
>>> kern.elf64.aslr.shared_page: 1
>>> kern.elf64.aslr.stack: 1
>>> kern.elf64.aslr.honor_sbrk: 0
>>> kern.elf64.aslr.pie_enable: 1
>>> kern.elf64.aslr.enable: 1
>>> vm.aslr_restarts: 256
>>>
>>> I did the esr build to test the build setup, since also the pkg in the
>>> official pkg repo behaves the same i.e the one before 115.5 since 115.5 did
>>> not hit the pkg repo yet, which works without aslr (set by proccontrol) So
>>> unless 116 introduces something which requires sysctl changes for the
>>> building tool chain while building my test should be valid.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> /jsm
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Nuno Teixeira
>> FreeBSD Committer (ports)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Nuno Teixeira
> FreeBSD Committer (ports)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Nuno Teixeira
FreeBSD Committer (ports)