Re: When will FreeBSD support RPI5?

Warner Losh <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <CANCZdfoMx4VcJ5aGkR4WJ6W6jz=xX=R5+PtiuHTsBKVCVVAeVg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sun, Jan 14, 2024 at 8:12 AM Emmanuel Vadot <[email protected]>
wrote:

> On Sun, 14 Jan 2024 13:52:51 +0000
> Doug Rabson <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 13 Jan 2024 at 18:32, Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 13, 2024, at 07:38, Doug Rabson <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Getting back to the RPI 5, with a tweak to
> > > arm/broadcom/bcm2835bcm2835_vcbus.c to treat the memory config the
> same as
> > > RPI 4 and to dev/sdhci/sdhci_fdt.c to treat the RPI 5 sdhci
> controllers as
> > > generic, I can boot to multiuser mode using the EDK2 firmware from
> > > https://github.com/worproject/rpi5-uefi with ACPI/Device Tree mode
> set to
> > > Both.
> > >
> > > What does FreeBSD do with "Both"? Does it actually use some ACPI
> > > and some Device Tree? Or does it just use ACPI? Does your
> > > combination do anything different than just using ACPI?
> > >
> > > > This does not have working PCIe or ethernet yet - I think ethernet
> ought
> > > to work since we seem to have a matching driver in the tree in
> dev/cadence.
> > >
> > > Sounds like the same status as booting just ACPI with no such
> > > adjustments too bcm2835bcm2835_vcbus.c or sdhci_fdt.c ?
> > >
> > > I think Mike Karels plans on investigating getting Ethernet
> > > going based on cgem . I've no clue if this is ACPI, DeviceTree,
> > > or both.
> > >
> > > My usage has been pure ACPI, no software adjustments specific
> > > to getting the RPi5 operational. Use of a USB3 Ethernet dongle.
> > >
> >
> > As far as I can tell, 'Both' works almost exactly the same as
> 'Devicetree'
> > - I don't think the acpi device is attached to nexus at all.
>
>  'Both' for EDK2 mean that dt and acpi table are exposed, and by
> default on FreeBSD we use dt and only fallback to acpi if dt wasn't
> found.
>

I think we should check dt and if it has a simplebus use it, otherwise
fallback to acpi if dt wasn't there or if it didn't have a simple bus. That
would fix issues I have with LinuxBoot where some data still lingers
in dt, but no devices are published there anymore. I work around this right
now by preferring ACPI manually...

Warner
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.