Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock
Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <433162018.16507.1720382837193@localhost> |
Van: Warner Losh <[email protected]> Datum: zondag, 7 juli 2024 19:18 Aan: Ronald Klop <[email protected]> CC: bob prohaska <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Onderwerp: Re: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock > > > On Sun, Jul 7, 2024, 11:16AM Ronald Klop <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I created fakertc for my rpi4. >> >> https://www.freshports.org/sysutils/fakertc/ >> >> Saves the time on shutdown and sets it back early at boot. >> >> Plus I use ntpdate together with ntpd. Works fine. > > > Curious why the root mod time isn't firing... it whould alrwady do that > > Warner > __blockquote_end__ > > I'm using ZFS as root. AFAIK ZFS does not implement the usage of superblock unmount timestamp as time sync on boot like UFS. (or did you mean something else with "root mod time"?) > > Regards, > Ronald. > > >> >> >>> >>> Regards, >>> Ronald >>> >>> Van: bob prohaska <[email protected]> >>> Datum: 7 juli 2024 18:01 >>> Aan: [email protected] >>> Onderwerp: ntpd vs ntpdate with no hardware clock >> >> >> >