Re: OT, self-signed ssl certificate generation

bob prohaska <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, Aug 29, 2024 at 11:00:23AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> > 
> > In trying to get ssl working for apache24 I tried to follow the
> > instructions for self-signed certificate generation at
> > https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/security/index.html
> > in section 16.8.1, Generating Certificates.
> > 
> > The first example for generating a key and signing request
> > behaved as expected, generating a cert.key and req.pem file.
> > 
> > The second example, for a self-signed certificate, adjusted to:
> > openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -sha3-512 -keyout host.key -out host.crt
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This command works for me. So I think you should look further what fails.
> That it does not prompt for user input sounds like openssl does not execute properly. What is the exit code of running the command?
> Does it give any output?
> 

The first thing it prompted for was a pass phrase. There being no reason
to have one, I simply hit Enter. Eventually I accidentally discovered
that providing a passphrase allows certificate and key generation to
proceed. But, I don't see any reason for a passphrase on a self-signed 
certificate key. If I were sending the certificate elsewhere for signing 
it might make sense. Am I missing something?

In the meantime I learned of security/xca and started reading the docs at
https://hohnstaedt.de/xca/index.php/documentation/manual
which has proved a large bite to swallow. In particular, the relationship
between a host certificate and a CA certificate eludes me.

Perhaps putting a plaintext password in the apache config file isn't so 
bad in comparison if it works!

> Mine gives:
> $ openssl req -new -x509 -days 365 -sha3-512 -keyout host.key -out host.crt
[big snip]
> ..........+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++*...+...+...+.+......+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++*..+.........+...+.+............+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Enter PEM pass phrase:
> Verifying - Enter PEM pass phrase:
> -----
> You are about to be asked to enter information that will be incorporated
> into your certificate request.
> What you are about to enter is what is called a Distinguished Name or a DN.
> There are quite a few fields but you can leave some blank
> For some fields there will be a default value,
> If you enter '.', the field will be left blank.
> -----
> Country Name (2 letter code) [AU]:NL
> State or Province Name (full name) [Some-State]:NH
> Locality Name (eg, city) []:Amsterdam
> Organization Name (eg, company) [Internet Widgits Pty Ltd]:Henk
> Organizational Unit Name (eg, section) []:
> Common Name (e.g. server FQDN or YOUR name) []:henk.example.org
> Email Address []:[email protected]
> 

If I enter a non-null passphrase I see functionally what you see.

Probably I should just accept the necessity of a passphrase and
resume trying to get apache working with https; getting chromium
to accept a self-signed certificate is proving difficult.

Then the original goal of getting sendmail to use tls will be a 
little bit closer. That's what started the whole fire drill.

Thanks for writing!

bob prohaska
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.