Re: Official stable/14 builds of armv6 have been broken for over a month ( Tier 3 for stable/14 )
Mark Millard <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm,gmane.os.freebsd.stable |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Looks like it is not going to be a great day . . .] On Oct 20, 2024, at 11:20, Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Oct 20, 2024, at 10:41, Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The build just after the last successful one for stable/14 armv6 looks to be: >> >> >> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-14-armv6-build/1008/ >> >> #1008 (Mon Sep 09 21:44:50 GMT 2024) >> 755e773877e9f3abab3bed2d46d9d87978e303d9 >> >> >> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-14-armv6-build/1008/console >> >> 15:32:05 ld: error: undefined reference due to --no-allow-shlib-undefined: zfs_sha256_block_armv7 >> 15:32:05 >>> referenced by /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv6/tmp/usr/lib/libicp.so >> 15:32:05 >> 15:32:05 ld: error: undefined reference due to --no-allow-shlib-undefined: zfs_sha512_block_armv7 >> 15:32:05 >>> referenced by /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv6/tmp/usr/lib/libicp.so >> >> >> But builds from today show the same type of error: >> >> >> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-14-armv6-build/1206/ >> >> #1206 (Sun Oct 20 15:18:03 GMT 2024) >> edbeda6b759459a9c2c5e8e12b18294d41959270 >> >> >> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-stable-14-armv6-build/1206/console >> >> 08:53:28 ld: error: undefined reference due to --no-allow-shlib-undefined: zfs_sha256_block_armv7 >> 08:53:28 >>> referenced by /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv6/tmp/usr/lib/libicp.so >> 08:53:28 >> 08:53:28 ld: error: undefined reference due to --no-allow-shlib-undefined: zfs_sha512_block_armv7 >> 08:53:28 >>> referenced by /usr/obj/usr/src/arm.armv6/tmp/usr/lib/libicp.so >> >> >> So around 1.3 months without a successful build. It would seem >> one of the following would be better than wasting machine >> resources on failing, long-running qemu based builds . . . > > Ignore my mistaken reference to qemu being involved. It > still took around 9hrs in one case or 15.5 hrs in the > other case for the above 2 examples to fail. How many > build attempts were there over the 10.3 months or so? 1.3 months, of course, not 10.3 months. >> ) stop trying to have stable/14 armv6 builds >> or: >> ) get the stable/14 armv6 builds working again >> >> >> Note: I do not use armv6 builds. I just happened to notice this >> when I was looking at https://ci.freebsd.org/tinderbox/ for >> other reasons. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com