Re: Someone installed an aarch64 Christmas gift: There is now a ampere4 with 150 or so FreeBSD CPUs and 24 builders running in parallel
Jason Bacon <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12/25/25 18:06, Mark Millard wrote: > On Dec 25, 2025, at 15:10, Mark Millard <[email protected]> wrote: > >> ampere4 was showing 52.27 for the short term load >> average and that that was 33%. So, something like >> 150+ FreeBSD CPUs (1 per core I assume), if I >> understand right. >> >> The Jobs Id's were 01 .. 24 , so 24 poudriere builders. >> >> It was also showing: SwapInfo 100.00% when I looked >> at that. So it may currently be RAM+SWAP limited for >> its current configuration. >> >> ampere4 was building 150arm64-quarterly. In 21:45:36 >> it had built 10802 port-packages, including 9 that >> had taken over 10 hours to build and 10 more that >> had taken over 5 hrs to build (top 15 completed >> time takers as of when I looked). >> >> Hmm. It just showed a 105.?? load average with a 66% >> figure. (I do not remember the ?? digits.) That is >> a mean of well over 3 per builder. (For all I know >> ampere4 could be doing other things as well as the >> port-package builds.) >> >> Having ampere4 in use ought to help with the aarch64 >> port package build-times issues, even if ampere1 >> continues to fail fairly frequently. > > Looking at the Ampere site, it looks like ampere4 is > a 160 core AmpereOne or AmpereOne M system. The "M" > as more RAM channels but only up to 1.5 TiBytes: 1 DIMM > per channel, 12 channels. The plain AmpereOne can have > 4 TiBytes: 1 or 2 DIMMs per channel, 8 channels. > > I've no clue how much RAM ampere4 actually has, or what > its RAM+SWAP figure is as configured. > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > > Nice... It'll be good to see packaging lags reduced on my Apple Silicon VMs. There *is* a Santa! -- Life is a game. Play hard. Play fair. Have fun.