Re: vmm (bhyve) on GICv2
Mario Marietto <[email protected]> Fri, 1 May 2026 03:05:36 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CA+1FSigcOAseJXTf5vbiZ=BFmzMbn6EJFHn7Fkzzmubvff6_WA@mail.gmail.com> |
Thanks. My goal is to virtualize a minimal Linux image using bhyve for arm64,but it seems that the Radxa Zero 3W can't do it due to some limitations. On Fri, May 1, 2026 at 1:31 AM Aleksandr Rybalko <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Mario! > > It seems. > > "The GIC-600 supports the GICv3 architecture, see the Arm Generic > Interrupt Controller Architecture Specification, GIC architecture version > 3.0 and version 4.0." > From > https://developer.arm.com/documentation/100336/0106/introduction/about-the-gic-600 > > Radxa ZERO 3W --> Rockchip RK3566 --> GIC-600 > > Thanks! > > ср, 29 квіт. 2026 р. о 02:50 Mario Marietto <[email protected]> пише: > >> Hello to everyone. >> >> I would like to try bhyve for arm64 bit on my radxa zero 3W. Does anyone >> know if this board supports GICv3 ? >> >> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 10:29 PM Mario Marietto <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Is there another cheap alternative to the RockPro64 / Quartz64 that >>> works well on FreeBSD if one wants to test bhyve ? >>> >>> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:39 PM Mario Marietto <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> This ? >>>> >>>> https://pine64.com/product/quartz64-model-a-8gb-single-board-computer/ >>>> >>>> On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 9:20 PM John F Carr <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> > On May 22, 2024, at 13:20, Mario Marietto <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > Can someone confirm that bhyve works ok on the RockPro64 (RK3399) ? >>>>> Has bhyve been patched in relation to this bug : >>>>> > >>>>> > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=277559 >>>>> > >>>>> > ? >>>>> > >>>>> > I read that there is a huge amount of work to do on the RPI5 before >>>>> it works with FreeBSD. And anyway,it does not support bhyve. So if I will >>>>> buy a soc,it will be the RockPro64.... >>>>> >>>>> The RockPro64 should be usable for development, not production use >>>>> of virtual machines. The kernel sometimes locks up the first time the >>>>> vmm module is loaded. Once the module loads it can be unloaded >>>>> and reloaded without risk. >>>>> >>>>> I was able to boot FreeBSD-13.3-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64.raw in bhyve >>>>> on my RockPro64 with this script: >>>>> >>>>> NCPU=1 >>>>> MEM=384m >>>>> DISK0=/dev/nda0s4 >>>>> VMNAME=thirteen >>>>> bhyve -c "${NCPU:?}" -m "${MEM:?}" \ >>>>> -s 0:0,hostbridge \ >>>>> -s 1:0,virtio-blk,"${DISK0:?}" \ >>>>> -o bootrom=/usr/local/share/u-boot/u-boot-bhyve-arm64/u-boot.bin \ >>>>> -o rtc.use_localtime=false \ >>>>> -o console=stdio \ >>>>> -o config.dump=false \ >>>>> -o acpi_tables=true \ >>>>> "${VMNAME:?}" >>>>> >>>>> I had copied the image to /dev/nda0s4. It should work just as well >>>>> with the >>>>> regular file after "virtio-blk". >>>>> >>>>> Some observations: >>>>> >>>>> 1. There is no clock visible to the guest OS: >>>>> >>>>> Warning: no time-of-day clock registered, system time will not be set >>>>> accurately >>>>> >>>>> 2. The RockPro system has two types of cores. One has a physically >>>>> indexed I-cache, >>>>> the other virtually indexed. The virtual CPU reports a virtually >>>>> indexed cache. >>>>> >>>>> CPU 0: ARM Foundation-Model r0p0 affinity: 0 >>>>> Cache Type = <64 byte D-cacheline,64 byte >>>>> I-cacheline,VIPT ICache,64 byte ERG,64 byte CWG> >>>>> >>>>> I think this will cause correct behavior despite being technically >>>>> wrong. >>>>> >>>>> I have a Quartz64, a newer Pine64 SBC, but I have not yet tried to >>>>> install BSD on it. >>>>> >>>>> John Carr >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Mario. >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Mario. >>> >> >> >> -- >> Mario. >> > > > -- > WBW > ------- > Rybalko Aleksandr <[email protected]> > aka Alex RAY <[email protected]> > D-Link.ua > -- Mario.