Re: Orange Pi 6 Plus works (15.1-RELEASE)
Sulev-Madis Silber <[email protected]> Tue, 30 Jun 2026 04:08:00 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.arm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On June 30, 2026 3:56:50 AM GMT+03:00, Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-arm-fre= ebsd-org097@ketas=2Esi=2Epri=2Eee> wrote: > > >On June 30, 2026 3:27:18 AM GMT+03:00, Kevin Day <kevin@your=2Eorg> wrote= : >> >> >>> On Jun 29, 2026, at 5:37=E2=80=AFPM, Sulev-Madis Silber <freebsd-arm-f= reebsd-org097@ketas=2Esi=2Epri=2Eee> wrote: >>>=20 >>>> 0-1,6-11 are fast, and 2-5 are slow=2E However, it seems like the sch= eduler is just randomly picking a core, so performance varies wildly depend= ing on which one you hit=2E >>>>=20 >>>> kern=2Esched=2Etopology_spec: <groups> >>>> <group level=3D"1" cache-level=3D"3"> >>>> <cpu count=3D"12" mask=3D"fff,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0,0">0, 1, 2,= 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11</cpu> >>>> </group> >>>> </groups> >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>> Is there an easy fix for this? Linux gets it right, but I'm really un= familiar with the low level of arm board support to understand how/where it= 's learning the topology=2E >>>>=20 >>>> -- Kevin >>>>=20 >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> i'm surprised it works at all >>>=20 >>> iirc, no multiple speed cpu systems have support in fbsd so far, i hav= en't even heard it being planned, so booting current is not likely to help = either >>>=20 >>> the more hw experienced guys(/gals?) can add additional info here or c= orrect me or add any roadmaps >> >>Ahhh you're right, sorry everyone=2E I thought I read that ULE gained su= pport for Alder Lake's E-cores, but I guess that was only proposed not done= yet=2E >> >>-- Kevin >> >> > > >i'm not member of every ml but i know efnet/#bsdmips irc channel has know= ing people in it, should you have time to dev this > >possibly same or other people read it here > >i looked into commit logs and found nothing on cix p1, except false posit= ives on pcix > >also found <https://wiki=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/Scheduler/Hybrid> but can't comm= ent much about stuff written in it > >to me it looks more like that this subproject is in some pre-code stage= =2E hopefully it didn't just fizzle out > >basically we need user, tester, and dev=2E can you be all of those 3 or j= ust 2 first parts? > >i, most of time, am the first 2 > >those are my observations so far about assymetric multiprocessing on free= bsd > <https://forums=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/threads/kernel-support-for-heterogeneous-c= ores=2E98526/> possibly everyone found this all already perhaps this could be tied with laptop support, as it's most likely mostly= used for mobile platforms and less elsewhere tho with power prices nowadays, even servers like this=2E tho, i think big= platforms use symmetric cpus and just scale them for power if usage is low= =2E also saves on cooling=2E but i question the low time on Servers (TM)