Re: PPPoEoA?
Harti Brandt <[email protected]> Mon, 6 Jan 2003 10:30:43 +0100 (CET)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.atm |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 6 Jan 2003, Thomas Gellekum wrote:
TG>Moin,
TG>
TG>I'm trying to set up a PPPoEoA server. Being new to ATM I have a few
TG>basic questions.
TG>
TG>The HARP stack seems to provide only a logical network device, which
TG>is unsuitable for pppoed. Cards that work with NATM look like a solution
TG>for -STABLE, and for -CURRENT, there's netgraph-atm with its assorted
TG>drivers. That means that the ENI-155 or Adaptec ANA-59x0 with the en(4)
TG>driver, or the Marconi PCA200E or HE155 with the ngatm drivers should do
TG>what I want without further work. Is that correct so far?
TG>
TG>Currently, I have a Prosum PROATM 155F available. The driver by Prosum
TG>probably needs to be changed for NATM or ngatm. Any gotchas I'll have
TG>to watch for when doing that?
Actually a driver for NATM is much easier than one for HARP. ngatm adds
only a little bit bu allowing to specify parameters for different
connection types. Converting from HARP to this should mean taking out
stuff.
As far as I understand PPP over ATM does not involve any signalling
(purely PVCs). In this case using ngatm should be trivial. You need only
the drivers, the ng_atm node and a script that plugs everything together.
harti
--
harti brandt, http://www.fokus.gmd.de/research/cc/cats/employees/hartmut.brandt/private
[email protected], [email protected]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-atm" in the body of the message