Re: Vote in favor of keeping ATM (was: NATM still scheduled for removal - please follow up to keep it in-tree)

Hans Petter Selasky <[email protected]> Sat, 19 Feb 2011 15:44:06 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.usb,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.atm
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Saturday 19 February 2011 15:14:17 Martin Birgmeier wrote:
> - what do I need to do on the USB side to start receive and transmit 
> machines (do I need to start separate kernel threads or just issue two 
> usbd_transfer_setup() calls as for loading the firmware),

USB already has some kernel threads which all callbacks are executed from. If 
your software does not sleep I.E. pause() in the callbacks, then it should be 
OK to execute the ATM stack directly from USB.

--HPS