The fate of ngatm

Brooks Davis <[email protected]> Thu, 27 Apr 2017 18:00:29 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.atm,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

As previous threatened, I've removed support for NATM (as well as a
remarkable number of remnants of the old ATM framework).  One piece
that still remains is the ngatm framework in netgraph.  This includes
the ng_ccatm(4), ng_sscfu(4), ng_sscop(4), and ng_uni(4) nodes.

These don't attach to physical interfaces and didn't depend on the NATM
interface code so I left them alone in the first cut.  My question
is, are they useful without physical interfaces?  If so, keeping them
doesn't appear to have a high support burden.  If not, we should remove
them.

-- Brooks

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZAjG8AAoJEKzQXbSebgfAx08H/jXMPxEqHqlBvr2LAfkIq7wf
8H6zkiCxcv6F0J+bwfkJwDmWEJ+/D36nGAFdul2MfxRfVP8121QrYVp3HrkXpaIr
Eje8SVPMhB5QXmHZoqsozRkdPLAiKjM0qv9W4Y7gnfb4fn5JRt1/VeCPNGKgcoKi
pnM6HvkzC/d2xaIF6BXDmNpJW8g4Zk1+TDDFJDqKtYagm7G4CQRajRtyt1jbj2ub
blmBo9NbHZTVn1yDC1LO08Jdpjx+tPaIq4xp+E6+1J6rCT780YIiQRsjD11gdvtS
jBet1jNzrO1vIPp3sL9OWMwtHTQCgr40HmYasI1DxhC8YBl5v+RxZ0tCQWovcz0=
=DdUp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5vNYLRcllDrimb99--