Re: %j for printf(9)

Dima Dorfman <[email protected]> writes:
> I still like my restructure, but since other people don't seem to
> share my opinion, I'm fine doing it another (your) way.  That said, I
> think your patch has some bugs that mine doesn't.  For example, this:
> 
> 	printf("%ld\n", -4);
> 
> yields "4294967292" with your patch, but not with mine (mine, and
> printf(3), yield "-4").  I think the attached patch (relative to
> subr_prf.c *with* your patch applied) fixes it.

Yep.  Commit?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [email protected]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message