Re: %j for printf(9)

Bruce Evans <[email protected]> writes:
> It came out 1 line shorter with less duplication for me.  Here is a patch
> relative to the version in your next mail.  I didn't rename fetch* to
> handle*, and I may have broken something moved the initializations of
> `sign' around too much.  I reordered some initializations (especially for
> %p) so that the order is almost (?) always (base, ..., sign, num).

Applied, and renamed fetch_* to handle_*.  I'll test it a bit before
committing.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [email protected]

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message