Re: suidperl

> On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:35:04AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
> > By the way, do we really need a perl wrapper in the first place? I
> > suppose we can tweak ports/lang/perl5 to create symlinks (for example)
> > when NO_PERL_SYMLINKS is not defined.
> 
> This question really needs to be decided on.  Not being a Perl-head I
> don't feel qualified to have an opinion.  But we do seem to be lacking a
> little leadership here.  If we are going to have a wrapper, using
> `mailwrapper' may be better as it is more exact and does not depend on
> one's PATH setting.

I am inclining myself to the mailwrapper idea, but generalised out
to do more than mail.

CURRENT's current perl-wrapper is a good idea, but it is incomplete
IMO.

M
-- 
o       Mark Murray
\_
O.\_    Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message