Re: [PATCH] nfsserver patch for review
Bruce Evans <[email protected]> Fri, 25 Mar 2005 14:29:01 +1100 (EST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.audit |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, 25 Mar 2005, Xin LI wrote: > From NetBSD: > > For nfs3 requests, don't gather writes since it's clients' responsibility. > > Will anyone object if I will commit this against -CURRENT? Not me. Is it actually faster and/or more efficient (hopefully both)? Write gathering may wrong even in the nfsv2 case, since the underlying file system should do write clustering, and at least ffs does it, and write clustering at the lowest level works well. BTW, there is lots of vaguely related bogusness involving fsyncing writes: - in the nfsv3 case, the server should just fsync what the client requests, but doesn't always. - the async mount flag is bogus for nfs, and the vfs.nfs.async sysctl is even more bogus. Interaction of these bogusnesses with not always honoring the client's fsync requests give many sub-bugs. Bruce _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-audit To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"