Re: freebsd-cluster Digest, Vol 136, Issue 1

Andrei Manescu <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.cluster
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Erik,


Why would ggate geom module not suit you ? (You haven't mentioned it, but
since you've been using FreeBSD since 2.1 I'm sure you're familiar with it).



2010/2/28 <[email protected]>

> Send freebsd-cluster mailing list submissions to
>        [email protected]
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>        http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>        [email protected]
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>        [email protected]
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of freebsd-cluster digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Cluster Filesystem on FreeBSD (Erik Scholtz, ArgonSoft GmbH)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 12:09:51 +0100
> From: "Erik Scholtz, ArgonSoft GmbH" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Cluster Filesystem on FreeBSD
> To: [email protected]
> Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi,
>
> I did some research the last two weeks on how to build a cluster
> filesystem on FreeBSD.
>
> Since neither GFS ( http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/gfs/ ) nor OCFS2 (
> http://oss.oracle.com/projects/ocfs2/ ) are ported to FreeBSD, I took a
> look at the GlusterFS-project ( http://www.gluster.org/ ), which also
> does not compile on FreeBSD 7.x, as well as PVFS ( http://www.pvfs.org/ ).
>
> My solution at the moment is, to rsync all filesystems once a minute,
> which is rather to rare. So I tried to get a hook with KQueue to rsync
> the filesystems on data-change. Unfortunatly I could not find a working
> solution (had a try with IO::KQueue using perl).
>
> NFS isn't really a solution, since it is slow (even on 1GBit) and is a
> single point of failure: Clustering the NFS server with machines in
> stand-by, that do a fail-over on a crash of the master-NFS is unstable
> and makes a lot more costs to the project.
>
> I'm with FreeBSD since the 2.1 release and I really love this system for
> it's performance and stability. But in the last year I came very often
> to a point, where I had no solution on FreeBSD and several solutions for
> Linux (like SAS-support, ...).
>
>
> How do you guys solve this problem (of a shared filesystem with
> rw-option)? Any hints are welcome, since I'm getting very frustrated at
> the moment.
>
> Greetings,
> Erik
>
> --
>
> My blog: http://blog.elitecoderz.net
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
>
>
> End of freebsd-cluster Digest, Vol 136, Issue 1
> ***********************************************
>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-cluster
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.