svn commit: r54041 - head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls

Alex Dupre <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.cvs.doc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Author: ale
Date: Tue Apr  7 10:02:50 2020
New Revision: 54041
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/doc/54041

Log:
  Fix typo in IPFW page and s/reassamble/reassemble/g
  
  PR:		245396
  Submitted by:	[email protected]

Modified:
  head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls/chapter.xml

Modified: head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls/chapter.xml
==============================================================================
--- head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls/chapter.xml	Mon Apr  6 17:10:38 2020	(r54040)
+++ head/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls/chapter.xml	Tue Apr  7 10:02:50 2020	(r54041)
@@ -2256,18 +2256,18 @@ ipfw -q nat 1 config if &dollar;pif same_ports unreg_o
       <para>The inbound <acronym>NAT</acronym> rule is inserted
 	<emphasis>after</emphasis> the two rules which allow all
 	traffic on the trusted and loopback interfaces and after the
-	reassamble rule but <emphasis>before</emphasis> the
+	reassemble rule but <emphasis>before</emphasis> the
 	<literal>check-state</literal> rule.  It is important that the
 	rule number selected for this <acronym>NAT</acronym> rule, in
 	this example <literal>100</literal>, is higher than the first
 	three rules and lower than the <literal>check-state</literal>
 	rule.  Furthermore, because of the behavior of in-kernel
-	<acronym>NAT</acronym> it is advised to place a reassamble
+	<acronym>NAT</acronym> it is advised to place a reassemble
 	rule just before the first <acronym>NAT</acronym> rule and
 	after the rules that allow traffic on trusted interface.
 	Normally, <acronym>IP</acronym> fragmentation should not
 	happen, but when dealing with <acronym>IPSEC/ESP/GRE</acronym>
-	tunneling traffic it might and the reassmabling of fragments
+	tunneling traffic it might and the reassembling of fragments
 	is necessary before handing the complete packet over to the
 	in-kernel <acronym>NAT</acronym> facility.</para>
 
@@ -2275,7 +2275,7 @@ ipfw -q nat 1 config if &dollar;pif same_ports unreg_o
 	<para>The reassemble rule was not needed with userland
 	  &man.natd.8; because the internal workings of the
 	  <application>IPFW</application> <literal>divert</literal>
-	  action already takes care of reassambling packets before
+	  action already takes care of reassembling packets before
 	  delivery to the socket as also stated in &man.ipfw.8;.</para>
 
 	<para>The <acronym>NAT</acronym> instance and rule number used
@@ -2287,7 +2287,7 @@ ipfw -q nat 1 config if &dollar;pif same_ports unreg_o
 
       <programlisting>&dollar;cmd 005 allow all from any to any via xl0  # exclude LAN traffic
 &dollar;cmd 010 allow all from any to any via lo0  # exclude loopback traffic
-&dollar;cmd 099 reass all from any to any in       # reassamble inbound packets
+&dollar;cmd 099 reass all from any to any in       # reassemble inbound packets
 &dollar;cmd 100 nat 1 ip from any to any in via &dollar;pif # NAT any inbound packets
 # Allow the packet through if it has an existing entry in the dynamic rules table
 &dollar;cmd 101 check-state</programlisting>
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-doc-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.