Re: git: 56ade3a6b9 - main - 15.0/relnote: Mention 32 bit platform removal

John Baldwin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.cvs.doc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 12/1/25 15:09, Alexander Ziaee wrote:
> The branch main has been updated by ziaee:
> 
> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/doc/commit/?id=56ade3a6b9d0212d307a05b8b32a4d711bf70a3e
> 
> commit 56ade3a6b9d0212d307a05b8b32a4d711bf70a3e
> Author:     Alexander Ziaee <[email protected]>
> AuthorDate: 2025-12-01 19:04:45 +0000
> Commit:     Alexander Ziaee <[email protected]>
> CommitDate: 2025-12-01 19:49:05 +0000
> 
>      15.0/relnote: Mention 32 bit platform removal
> ---
>   website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc | 3 +++
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc b/website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc
> index d70f7d6053..0b5e1d6d3c 100644
> --- a/website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc
> +++ b/website/content/en/releases/15.0R/relnotes.adoc
> @@ -960,6 +960,9 @@ On amd64, handling of the `%fsbase`/`%gsbase` registers and tls base were rework
>   gitref:68ba38dad3[repository=src]
>   {{< sponsored "the FreeBSD Foundation" >}}
>   
> +The venerable i386, armv6, and powerpc platforms have been retired.
> +We thank them for their service.

Hmm, this probably needs a bit more words as there are some subtle differences here:

- armv6 support has been removed entirely, but armv7 support remains.  In practice
   I think this just means that FreeBSD 16 won't run on a system with an ARM CPU older
   than v7.

- For i386 and 32-bit powerpc (and it's worth being explicit about powerpc since sometimes
   "powerpc" is used as an umbrella term that covers both 32-bit and 64-bit), native
   kernels are no longer supported, but existing 32-bit binaries can still be executed
   using 32-bit compatibility mode under a 64-bit kernel.

- For armv7, i386, powerpcspe, and powerpc, no release media or other artifacts are
   provided, nor are any pre-built packages provided.  (And this point is perhaps a
   reason why I think this doesn't belong in a kernel-only section, but a top-level
   "architectures" section.)

-- 
John Baldwin
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.