git: 6b4523011723 - main - unionfs_noderem(): fix typo
Jason A. Harmening <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.cvs.src |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6a88fc33.32442.dff23e8__21801.6696207755$1787362386$gmane$org@gitrepo.freebsd.org> |
The branch main has been updated by jah: URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=6b452301172391815c6e21a9875f75c8ddb35735 commit 6b452301172391815c6e21a9875f75c8ddb35735 Author: Jason A. Harmening <[email protected]> AuthorDate: 2026-08-15 16:16:09 +0000 Commit: Jason A. Harmening <[email protected]> CommitDate: 2026-08-22 01:32:15 +0000 unionfs_noderem(): fix typo Reviewed by: kib, markj Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D58858 --- sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c b/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c index 6489eb77ce2b..3254808fd490 100644 --- a/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c +++ b/sys/fs/unionfs/union_subr.c @@ -491,7 +491,7 @@ unionfs_noderem(struct vnode *vp) * to synchronize against any unionfs_lock() operation which may still * hold the lower vnode lock. We do not need to do this for the root * vnode, as the root vnode should always have both upper and lower - * base vnodes for its entire lifecycled, so unionfs_lock() should + * base vnodes for its entire lifecycle, so unionfs_lock() should * never attempt to lock its lower vnode in the first place. * Moreover, during unmount of a non-"below" unionfs mount, the lower * root vnode will already be locked as it is the covered vnode.