Re: scsi_target witness lock error

Sean Bruno <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.firewire,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.scsi
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Nate Lawson wrote:
> Sean Bruno wrote:
>   
>> Alrighty, a little cleaner patch to allow sbp_targ.c to acutally work
>> under RELENG_6. http://www.consultcsg.com/RELENG_6.diff
>>
>> Also and update with the witness error.  And the kernel config I am using:
>> http://www.consultcsg.com/scsitarget_witness.txt
>> http://www.consultcsg.com/FIREWIRE_TGT
>>
>> Is scsi_target the only application that is making this kern env witness
>> error appear?  I find it hard to believe that nothing else in the code
>> base hits this type of problem?
>>     
>
> Apparently scsi_target wasn't fully tested when the CAM locking went in.
>  It was written before there was a design for CAM locking so it may need
> some reworking.  For example, it assumes that it should acquire/drop
> locks multiple times in its start method if there are multiple CCBs
> queued.  That may not be the fastest way, depending on contention for
> the SIM lock.
>
>   
Hmmm...I just applied(ripped off!) a RELENG_7 modifed version of 
kern_environment.c that uses non-sleepable mutex's and the witness went 
away.
http://www.consultcsg.com/kern_env.diff

It appears that you are on to something Nate with regard to the CAM 
locking.  scsi_target appears to be blocking on a call to cam_periph_lock():
http://www.consultcsg.com/cam_periph_lock.txt

Hidetoshi suggested a patch that I will now apply and retest:
http://consultcsg.com/scsi_target.c.diff

I do however, get a kernel panic when trying to exit from scsi_target 
via ctrl-c
http://www.consultcsg.com/knlist_lock.txt

Sean

P.S.  Is the URL based logging working better than a cut/paste into the 
email for everyone?




_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-firewire
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.