[Bug 291316] textproc/libxml2: Update to 2.15.1
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.gnome |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/bugzilla/> |
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=291316 Charlie Li <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #267274| |maintainer-approval- Flags| | --- Comment #44 from Charlie Li <[email protected]> --- Comment on attachment 267274 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=267274 tarball with 4 git format-patch patches LZMA support is removed, including that the configure flag no longer exists. The upstream issue for removing -python https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/issues/891 is still open. While this can signify dissatisfaction in the bindings' continued presence, no firm action has been taken by the current maintainers, so EXPIRATION_DATE is premature. Not to mention one consumer still uses it unfortunately. At most DEPRECATED without a date is fine. The current upstream maintainer has completed work on the XPath stuff and is now committed as https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2/-/commit/0e50b31902cdb1eb242eb361c123e9e033b2af87 ; please use this commit directly (verified applies cleanly). net/pacemaker2 currently does not have a port maintainer so not sure why it's lumped in here, it could have been committed already. May also be a good idea to split security/xmlsec1 into a separate PR for approval since it has not been provided yet. Not totally satisfied with this design of providing docs. For the value that docs provides, it does not warrant a dance of flavours or child ports, unlike the bootstrap method from devel/glib20 and devel/gobject-introspection. The gtk-doc portion, ie the API documentation which are all HTML files, already live online as https://gnome.pages.gitlab.gnome.org/libxml2/html/index.html , so while nice to have locally, is not a priority if it introduces unnecessary complexity to build them. This leaves the man pages, which I'm more inclined to take bapt@'s approach of pre-rendering them or use docbook2mdoc at build time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.