Re: Call For Test: Powerd supported hwpstate_amd

ShengYi Hung wrote:
> Dear all:
> 
> Sorry for the confusion caused by the earlier version of the | 
> hwpstate_amd| driver I shared last month.
> 
> I’ve prepared a new patch that adds |powerd| support for |hwpstate_amd|. 
> The patch is available here [1].
> 
> Please note that this patch depends on a series of parent patches, all 
> of which must be applied first. For convenience, I’ve created a GitHub 
> branch [2] that contains the complete patch series, so you can use |git 
> am| to apply them in order.
> 
> On my Framework 13 (7040 series), the legacy P-State driver exposes only 
> three frequency levels, which limits control granularity. In contrast, 
> the CPPC driver exposes 10 frequency levels (and potentially more), 
> allowing |powerd| to manage CPU performance with much finer granularity.
> 
> That said, this driver still needs wider testing across different Zen2+ 
> systems. I would greatly appreciate any additional testing and feedback.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> [1]: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D55477
> 
> [2]: https://github.com/aokblast/freebsd-src/commits/hwpstate_amd/ 
> cpufreq_write/
> 
I would like to test on my Green Sardine/Cezanne/5000 series, but this 
no longer applies on latest main, especially after D55251 landed. I 
commented in the review where the conflicts happened, but I'm not sure 
if the rest of my rebase attempt made any sense considering the other 
changes of D55251.

-- 
Charlie Li
...nope, still don't have an exit line.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wnsEABYIACMWIQTHxcCLnAXo3rFg6k7P+1cn7slqBAUCaZ9t+AUDAAAAAAAKCRDP+1cn7slqBKkp
AP9/iLk7vQ2+MO0DL/7VirjkNpbBkqFu1n7WH8IVu1NxfwD+PkyX5sfNdGjmKJCOwMtOX5np8JFo
q5ripP1axd05GQg=
=yGFx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----