Re: WITHOUT_BZIP2?
Lexi Winter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Enji Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote in <[email protected]>: > > On Mar 29, 2026, at 9:34 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav <[email protected]> wrote: > > We should probably drop both options outright, since we've never > > provided corresponding options for gzip, xz / lzma, or zstd. > > If there was a way to build bootloaders without bzip2 support, that > could save boot loader blocks for other things. That’s one case I can > think of where it makes sense making the support work as desired. but this would need to be a different option, since you wouldn't want to build the entire system without bzip2 support just for a smaller loader. similar to how WITHOUT_ZFS and WITHOUT_LOADER_ZFS work today.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 228 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYKAB0WIQSyjTg96lp3RifySyn1nT63mIK/YAUCac/lOgAKCRD1nT63mIK/ YL/XAQD2gEXVEHnbp8sFCbenUcQox3iTRCPcTD51U+pRvMxRLQD9GiZnbS2fL3/0 mvFDG7GMA0XVnBLybKw1oxZZSXVlDw0= =4WfL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----