Re: the case of untracked base shlibs
Sulev-Madis Silber <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
oh, hell, guys, it works can you name reasons why mixing ports is bad? there's binary compat for a reason. one could say that's an abuse but does it matter. iirc binary compat goes back to 4.3 bsd. anyone have pre fbsd 1 binary running still? i'm curious! i also have "consistent" 16 kernel 16 userland 13 ports which was created because user qemu only goes down (why?) on versions, not up. this needed shlibs symlinking to work, tho. openssl again i bet many have custom systems which they share. sometimes this could get official because os is for users eh the main reason for that scan was what to rebuild first. that could be important if you upgraded running system that way btw, when is arch a "*"? when there are no platform specific binaries in package? but there seems to be