Re: chflags -RL and symlinks pointing outside the traversal: preserve behavior or add a Capsicum guardrail?
Mark Johnston <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <aohiQ0r9NET5nevQ@nuc> |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 04:48:38AM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 10:41:22AM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote: > > In general, when capsicumizing utilities we try to avoid changing the > > behaviour. Here, we have no choice, and there's not much precedent for > > that that I'm aware of. > > > > I still think we should provide some way to work around any > > compatibility problems. Maybe, /rescue/chflags should not enter > > capability mode, and the workaround would be to use that instead. > > That's not a very general solution though. > IMO there must be an option to disable the capability mode. > Ideally, the option would be consistent across most of the utilities. I think this will require a long option, as Alan mentioned. --dereference-links-unsafely seems okay. > Also, if we are talking about making the capsicum entry semi-mandatory, > as the first step we should remove the CAPABILITIES/CAPABILITY_MODE > options from kernel build. (To make it clear, make the features > unconditional). I wonder if anyone actually disables them? There is some marginal performance benefit to doing so, for applications which manage large numbers of file descriptors. I do not object to removing those options, in any case. Doing so would simplify a bunch of quite complicated code.