Re: L2 cache errors???

Willem Jan Withagen <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hardware
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 28/07/2015 21:04, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 07/28/2015 13:40, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>> On 28/07/2015 19:48, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>> On 7/28/2015 1:16 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Are these what I think they are?
>>>> Errors in the CPU L2 cache?
>>>>
>>>> Are the ECC corrected?
>>>> Or is error really "data kaput"?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Could be. There is also an erratum issue that triggers these errors on
>>> certain CPUs when running software like virtualbox.  It was fixed in
>>> RELENG_10 some time ago. What are you running ?
>>>
>>>
>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=269052
>>>
>>> has some details.
>>
>> 'mmm,
>> Not running Haswell stuff, but rather older hardware.
>>
>> Looked in older logfiles, and there are a few more...
>> All with the same data, except that it is detected on different CPUs
>>
>> And it occurs when running:
>> 	        mbuffer -4 -m 1000M -I 6666 | \
>>                 zfs receive -F -d -v zfs
>> to receive a full backup from my fileserver.
>>
>> --WjW
>>
> 
> You can tell ECC corrected the error because on FreeBSD if ECC can't fix
> the error the system will panic.  Other systems (Solaris and HP-UX being
> the two I have direct experience with) can detach subsystems that have
> sustained uncorrectable errors in some cases. (Yes, even CPUs!)

Offlining CPus, cool.
No the system does not panic, but I do get reports from 'zfs receive'
that the datastream is invalid. And it then aborts.
So I'll have to do more digging, to see what is up.

> If a system is generating hundreds or thousands of MCAs a minute you are
> dealing with a hardware issue.
> 
> If you are getting spurious MCAs to the tune of a few a day there's
> nothing abnormal or broken there it's just the system doing what it's
> supposed to.

Never had them before, and now about 6 this week.
Let alone in L2 cache.
So it got me worried.

> Given the amount of data that flies around inside modern computers I'm
> surprised there aren't more MCAs than there are in most systems.

Perhaps not enough alpha particles hitting the cells. :)

Thanx,
--WjW

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.