Re: ECC support

Don Lewis <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hackers,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.hardware
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 15 Sep, Jim Thompson wrote:
> 
>> On Sep 15, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Don Lewis <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> On 15 Sep, Dieter BSD wrote:
>>> Many of AMD's CPU/APU parts support ECC memory.  Not just the top of the
>>> line parts, but also many of the less expensive, less power hungry parts.
>>> However, many (most?) of the boards for these chips do not support ECC,
>>> or at least do not admit to it.  They specify "non-ECC memory".
>>> 
>>> Obviously there have to be connections between the memory controller and
>>> the memory for the extra bits.  Aside from a little extra time for the
>>> board designer to add a few traces to the wire list, this would not
>>> raise the cost of the board.  Despite this I have read that some boards
>>> lack the necessary traces.
>> 
>> I don't think the current APU parts support ECC.  My guess is that the
>> current APU sockets don't have the connections to support it.
> 
> The G-Series (such as the T40E used on the APU) doesn’t support ECC.
> 
> “Kabini” (“G-Series 2.0” aka GX-210 / GX-415/420) supports a single channel of ECC ram.

Interesting ... it's been a while since I looked.  I think the primary
sockets at the time were FM1, FM2, and FM2+, and the mobile sockets, and
they didn't support ECC.

AM1 motherboard ECC support seems to be pretty lacking, though.


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.