Re: ECC support

Hi,

> On 22 Oct 2015, at 22:17, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Thursday, October 22, 2015 07:49:13 PM Bob Bishop wrote:
>> HI,
>> 
>>> On 22 Oct 2015, at 19:09, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 10:56:52 AM Dieter BSD wrote:
>>>> Chris:
>>>>> MCA: Bank 1, Status 0x9400000000000151
>>>>> MCA: Global Cap 0x0000000000000106, Status 0x0000000000000000
>>>>> MCA: Vendor "AuthenticAMD", ID 0x100f52, APIC ID 2
>>>>> 
>>>>> MCA: Address 0x81cc0e9f0
>>>>> 
>>>>> Kind of freaky. I've never had this error on this board before.
>>>>> On others tho.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Try a search for MCA instead.
>>>> 
>>>> Is there a decoder ring for those messages?  I don't recall seeing
>>>> messages like that, although I wasn't looking for them, and they
>>>> don't leap out at you screaming ERROR! ERROR!  Digital Unix had its
>>>> problems, but at least the error messages were fairly clear.
>>>> Something like "single bit memory error at address 0x12345..."
>>>> A simple edit to sys/x86/x86/mca.c
>>>>  s/printf("UNCOR ");/printf("Uncorrectable ");/
>>>>  s/printf("COR ");/printf("Correctable ");/
>>>> would make the messages at least slightly more meaningful to a viewer
>>>> who isn't intimently(sp) familiar with the mca.  Which most people aren't.
>>> 
>>> The problem is that there are other fields to decode and you can only fit so
>>> much in one line.  Also, there is not a CPU-independent way to know the
>>> address of an ECC error. [etc]
>> 
>> On server-class hardware, the platform management (BMC or whatever) is probably decoding this stuff for event logs and can be interrogated via IPMI (or whatever).
> 
> Not always well and not always with side effects you want.  On Core 2 and
> Nehalem i7 class hardware I measured that it took on the order of 400
> milliseconds (not micro) in SMM (system management mode, so your entire
> OS is halted) to write out each log entry to NVRAM.  At least one place I
> worked at turned the BIOS ECC logging off because that delay was too costly.
> 
> Also, even though your BMC may log it, the format for doing so isn't
> standard.  The details such as the affected DIMM are in the OEM bits of
> the log record, so not something you can easily extract from, say,
> ipmitool sel elist.  You'd have to log into the BIOS itself (or the BMC's
> web UI) to see which DIMM is affected.  Neither of those are really great
> for automated reporting.

All agreed. I was just flagging up the existence of another possible channel to get at ECC logging.

> -- 
> John Baldwin

--
Bob Bishop
[email protected]




_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hardware
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"