Re: svn commit: r261790 - in head/sys: amd64/include dev/acpica dev/cardbus dev/pccbb dev/pci i386/include sparc64/pci x86/include x86/pci x86/x86

Marcel Moolenaar <[email protected]> Wed, 12 Feb 2014 15:09:53 -0800

Newsgroups	gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ia64
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

On Feb 12, 2014, at 11:25 AM, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Tuesday, February 11, 2014 11:30:38 pm John Baldwin wrote:
>> Author: jhb
>> Date: Wed Feb 12 04:30:37 2014
>> New Revision: 261790
>> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/261790
>> 
>> Log:
>>  Add support for managing PCI bus numbers.  As with BARs and PCI-PCI bridge
>>  I/O windows, the default is to preserve the firmware-assigned resources.
>>  PCI bus numbers are only managed if NEW_PCIB is enabled and the architecture
>>  defines a PCI_RES_BUS resource type.
>>  - Add a helper API to create top-level PCI bus resource managers for each
>>    PCI domain/segment.  Host-PCI bridge drivers use this API to allocate
>>    bus numbers from their associated domain.
>>  - Change the PCI bus and CardBus drivers to allocate a bus resource for
>>    their bus number from the parent PCI bridge device.
>>  - Change the PCI-PCI and PCI-CardBus bridge drivers to allocate the
>>    full range of bus numbers from secbus to subbus from their parent bridge.
>>    The drivers also always program their primary bus register.  The bridge
>>    drivers also support growing their bus range by extending the bus resource
>>    and updating subbus to match the larger range.
>>  - Add support for managing PCI bus resources to the Host-PCI bridge drivers
>>    used for amd64 and i386 (acpi_pcib, mptable_pcib, legacy_pcib, and qpi_pcib).
>>  - Define a PCI_RES_BUS resource type for amd64 and i386.
> 
> Since ia64 only uses ACPI Host-PCI bridges, I believe that this can be enabled
> on ia64 by just adding an appropriate #define for PCI_RES_BUS to
> <machine/bus.h>.  I just have no way to test it.

I'll give it a spin. Altix 350 & Altix 450 have non-standard PCI
host controllers, which I do want to test. The firmware does not
dictate bus numbers, so it may be a non-issue.

Thanks for the heads-up!

-- 
Marcel Moolenaar
[email protected]

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 203 B)