Re: Support of ISDN Subsystem under Freebsd 6.x/7.x - amd64

On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:53:55 +0100
Oliver von Bueren <[email protected]> wrote:

> I still don't know why nobody bothers to include the i4b by HPS into the 
> main tree. I couldn't use the built-in stack since ages because of the 
> lack of proper card support for passive cards with CAPI support, which 
> is working in his version. Active ones might be better in the tree.
> 

HPS has a rather arcane coding style which makes it hard to maintain
his code in the tree. We don't want code in the tree which can be
maintained/understood by only one external developer.

As a port it would probably be OK, but it might be difficult to
integrate it cleanly. Still, there are other ports which touch the
kernel, so it should be doable. AFAIK HPS hasn't considered this
possiblility.

-- 
Gary Jennejohn
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"