Re: ISDN4BSD (HPS version) is going into ports
Andreas Longwitz <[email protected]> Tue, 15 Jan 2013 21:24:25 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.isdn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, please forget the last passage of my last post. In the meantime I changed some parts according to my former list to make things work like BSD does: >> 2. DELAY times on startup is different: 4 ms in isdn4bsd, 10 ms in BSD >> 3. Initializing the chip is more expansive in BSD, otherwise the >> register cmdrd is only used in isdn4bsd. >> >> 4. In avm_pci_fifo_reset() we write two single bytes, but BSD does one >> (atomic) four byte read. Particularly we do not write the HSCX_LEN >> byte between the both written bytes (must set to 0 ?) >> >> 5. In avm_pci_b_status_read() - analog to 4. - we read two single bytes, >> BSD (atomic) four bytes. With these adaptions isdn4bsd/isdnd now works with my AVM Fritzcard !! Because the driver works with "transparent mode" I observe that we have data exchange of 64kbit/s full duplex between chip and kernel as soon as a B-channel is up. And it makes no difference if I ping something over the line or run a ssh session or do nothing. I see about 500 irq's every second, I think that is the price for the tiny fifo buffer of 32 byte. Using the BSD driver I see for a ping only 12 irqs/sec and no irqs if the ping stops. Obviously thats not "transparent mode", the BSD driver uses HSCX_MODE_ITF_FLAG instead of HSCX_MODE_TRANS, that make probably the difference. If the 500 irqs/sec is what you expected, I will send you a complete patchfile. Thanks again for helping to track down this long standing problem. -- Andreas Longwitz _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"