Re: Sound delay in i4b

Dirk Thannhäuser <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.isdn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On May 15, 2006, at 9:38 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sunday 14 May 2006 22:57, Dirk Thannhäuser wrote:
>> On May 14, 2006, at 3:18 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Do you have SVN installed?
>>
>> yes i have. I checked out the version which included both, the i4b
>> and the chan_capi. Is ist possible that my version was to old?
>> I just did a new checkout.
>> Subversion says "Checked out revision 264."
>
> That should be the latest version. It was fixed in "Revision 257",  
> which was
> after that I released Version 1.6.0 in April.

Hmm. i compiled the latest release (i4b and chan_capi) yesterday and  
tested it with the echo test application. The delay is the same as  
before.
When I call the server internal (My Phone -> ISDNCard(NT) -> Asterisk  
(1.2.4) (isdnd not running. cards set to TE/NT mode via "isdnconfig"  
command . The delay in the echo test application remains unchanged at  
about 250ms to half a second. (not measured, it's just my feeling,  
but i know the difference to the zaptel FreeBSD driver). My machine  
is a Siemens Scenic L (1.6Ghz/512MB RAM). That schould be enough  
power to get low latency.
How easy would it be to play around with changing latencey. Should i  
take a look to the chan_capi sources to get latency changed?


>
>> Are there any "cheap" HFC-4S cards out there for testing?
>
> There exist some developer kits, but they are not so easy to get a  
> hand on.
> The only place I know that sales HFC-4S are:

A developer Kit would be the card of my choice.
Does Bero sell them or shoud i contact colognechip?
>
> http://shop.beronet.com
>
> And maybe "http://www.junghanns.net/".
>
>>
>> I think that this also means that i am not able to run one card
>> (HFC-1S) in slave mode, getting the clock from the other to keep them
>> in sync without soldering.
>
> Yes.
>
>> For Voice over IP a huger delay might be ok. thats also my opinion.
>> but what about Faxing over ISDN. Here I think latency is an important
>> issue. (didn't test the CAPI Fax receiption, yet)
>
> Faxing works, but really you need to use line interconnect to get  
> faxing
> working reliably. Or you can receive the fax in asterisk. That also  
> works.

Does it also work with about 250ms delay? (it exists on both sides  
from my NT-Card to asterisk and also from the TE-Card to asterisk
may be that i did something wrong compiling the sources although i  
cleaned the BSD sourcetree applied the patches again an then started  
compiling the get a "fresh" state an no confusion with the older  
release which was installed before.

>
> --HPS

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isdn
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.