Re: openjdk build failures on "nm"

I committed the change.

Looking through https://portsfallout.com/fallout?port=java/openjdk again, I noticed that it does not fail on main, only on 13.5 and 14.2. I don't know if that is a coincidence, a difference in the pkg cluster on main or some difference in clang/llvm or other build tooling.

But I thought it is worth mentioning.

Regards,
Ronald.

 
Van: Harald Eilertsen <[email protected]>
Datum: donderdag, 11 september 2025 10:15
Aan: Ronald Klop <[email protected]>
CC: [email protected]
Onderwerp: Re: openjdk build failures on "nm"
> 
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 09:32:08AM +0200, Ronald Klop wrote:
> > As it seems hard to debug, what do the java@ maintainers think of this experiment?
> >
> > diff --git a/java/openjdk17/Makefile b/java/openjdk17/Makefile
> > index 5cb25e6aee72..ba7001ff2bd0 100644
> > --- a/java/openjdk17/Makefile
> > +++ b/java/openjdk17/Makefile
> > @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ GH_PROJECT=   jdk17u
> >
> > NO_CCACHE=     yes
> >
> > -_MAKE_JOBS=    #
> > +MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=      yes
> > MAKE_ENV=      LANG="C" \
> >                LC_ALL="C" \
> >                CLASSPATH="" \
> 
> That's well spotted! I think this is definitely worth trying. I'm no
> expert on the ports Makefiles myself, but was told to use
> MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE instead in the review for openjdk24. Haven't gone
> through all the ancient version yet, as my focus is mainly on mainline,
> and these days on openjdk25.
> 
> > I can commit this today to openjdk17 and if builds start to succeed to other openjdk* ports.
> 
> I'm in favour!
> 
> H!
> 
> 
>