Re: package format and creation
The Anarcat <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.libh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20020809002829.GA20585@dojo> |
On Thu, 08 Aug 2002, Max Okumoto wrote: > The Anarcat <[email protected]> writes: [...] > > libh is, for me, 2 things: > > > > - console or Graphical UI > > - package library > > > > the rest is extensions, and we must not focus on those yet. Those > > extensions will have to be written for seperate package configurators > > (e.g. the "net" package configurator or "apache" configurator, etc). > > When you say extension do you mean? > libh/lib/fooext + libh/release/scripts/fooext.tcl I mean: libh/lib/foo || libh/*/scripts/foo.tcl (scripts might not be "release-related". I see the release directory as tools fitting for the installer) Anyways, "extensions" don't necessarly need to be "part of" libh, they can simply have libh as a dependency, as long as we don't end up with a circular dependency. A.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 249 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Pour information voir http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAj1TDK0ACgkQttcWHAnWiGe6xACeIlTNPimTOMvzV6PjQcF3DXnG Jh0AnAmKwoLd9jT40QFSel/0ahkbjsVr =UCZu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----