Re: LibH or Anaconda ??

Quoting David Johnson <[email protected]>:

> On Sunday 23 May 2004 08:52 pm, С ·Éçç wrote:
> 
> >   So , why don't you guys to think about migration rather than
> > rewriting a completely
> > different architecture for the installer ?
> 
> Anaconda is certainly an option, but I doubt a binary-only Anaconda
> is. 
> Think about it. We need to go beyond running Redhat's  installer in 
> Linux compatibility mode. Also. SuSE just open sourced their YaST 
> installer. That's an option as well.
> 
> -- 
> David Johnson
> ___________________
> http://www.usermode.org
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-libh
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to
> "[email protected]"
> 

I hear great things about SuSE's YaST and I generally think that using
it or Anaconda in the form of a native, ported, perhaps even enhanced
application is a great idea in general.

In summary, both Anaconda and YaST seem to have proven themselves in the
industry and giving people something they're already farmiliar with
from a UI stand-point is usually a win.

-- 
Adam C. Migus -- http://people.migus.org/~adam/
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-libh
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"