Re: LibH or Anaconda ??
David Johnson <[email protected]> Tue, 25 May 2004 19:59:14 -0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.libh |
|---|---|
| Organization | Usermode |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 06:58 pm, Gao Long wrote: > The only thing I thought about anaconda for a native FreeBSD > install is that , shall we package an entire FreeBSD into RPM > packages?:)While the rpm need a recompile if we are not to use > linux.ko.Or we will have to invent a different one? Since Anaconda is Open Source, that means we can change it to fit our needs. Not just the partitioning portion of it, but also the package management portion. In other words, we don't have to use RPM just because Anaconda does. p.s. I'm not sold on Anaconda, but neither am I sold against it. -- David Johnson ___________________ http://www.usermode.org _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-libh To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"