Re: util vs tools
Antoine Beaupre <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.libh |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Great! Thanks for your hard work, Okumoto. A. Le Lundi 6 mai 2002, à 03:23 , Max Okumoto a écrit : > You guys are right. We should only have one. It was just > habit from a previous project where they seperated scripts > from tools which were build from src. I will move all my stuff > into tools. I would also like to move find_classes_descriptions.pl > into tools. > > Max Okumoto > > Antoine Beaupre <[email protected]> writes: >> Well, as far as I can remember, both didn't exist until recently. >> >> A. >> >> Le Lundi 6 mai 2002, ‡ 01:39 , Jordan Hubbard a Ècrit : >> >>> Probably historical - I don't see any problem with consolidating them. >>> >>>> Why have a util *AND* tools directory? >>>> >>>> Seems to me the utils in there should be both in tools *or* util. I'd >>>> rather have them in tools. >>>> >>>> A. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected] with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message