Re: "Standard" version numbers (Re: SYSTEM package contradictions)

Thus spake Jordan K Hubbard ([email protected]):

> I guess we were being optimistic on the regular version thing.  I don't 
> see any problem with going to a unique serial number instead and making 
> the version number, if available, purely advisory.

I guess "regular version" is something like for the ispell ports
with lanuage sets enabled.  The ispell version would be the "regular"
version, and the version of the language sets would be a sub-version
or so.

But I don't know for sure.

A serial # would be more wise maybe.

Alex

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [email protected]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message