Re: AMD or Intel
Mag Gam <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks for the replies! It seems I would like to goto the AMD route because of the 64bit compatabality (yea..I am a victim of Marketing). What is the major difference between AMD64, Turion, and Sempron? On 7/13/05, Rainer Duffner <[email protected]> wrote: > Astrodog wrote: > > >>I purchased an e-machines AMD laptop in April and had nothing but > >>problems with cooling. The machine constantly over heated. So, if you > >>go the AMD route. Make sure you do some research and specifically > >>cooling issues. > >> > >>Ray > >> > >> > >> > > > >As a quick note, AMD Mobiles (Athlon64 Mobile, etc), tend to consume > >less power than comparable Intels (Non-Mobile P4s, Mobile EEs, etc). > >The overheating issue is most likely an e-machines issue, than an AMD > >one, per se. That being said, one thing to note on the AMD line, is > >that there really isn't a true low power mobile processor, either. Its > >basically Athlon64, Turion(sp), or Semperon, none of which would > >compare to say Pentium M, on power usage as far as I'm aware. > > > > > > > I think that's not exactly true. (Well, the conclusion may not be wrong, > but the reasoning is <g>). > Turion64-CPUs consume about as much (or little) energy as Pentium-M chips. > But due to better overall design, the total power-consumption of > "Centrino"-laptops is some Watts less than that of Turion64-powered ones. > > http://www.amd.com/us-en/Processors/ProductInformation/0,,30_118_12651_12658,00.html > > > > Rainer > _______________________________________________ > [email protected] mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]" > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"