Re: High interrupts w/ Cisco 350 card

"Peter D. Quilty" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.stable,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile
Message-ID <1127387609.1092.2.camel@pdq-laptop>
On Wed, 2005-09-21 at 18:01 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:

> On Tue, 2005-Sep-20 19:44:07 -0400, Peter D. Quilty wrote:
> >I'm running 5.4-RELEASE-p6 on a Toshiba Tecra M2 laptop.  My network
> >card is a Cisco 350 PCMCIA card.  I'm experiencing a very high rate of
> >interrupts during heavy network traffic.
> 
> Not quite.  "vmstat -i" reports 173 interrupts/sec.  That's not high.
> "systat -iostat" shows a ludicrously high interrupt load though.
> 
> I notice that almost all the hardware on your laptop maps to irq 11 -
> that's undesirable.  Can you convince your BIOS to use different
> interrupt mappings?



No, the PCI bus is hardcoded to use only irqs 10 & 11.  The video card
uses 10 and everything else shares 11.


> >  This Cisco card works fine in every other laptop I have.
> 
> What OS?



All are running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE.


> >  I suspect it might be a cardbus problem, but I don't
> >know how to resolve it or troubleshoot it any further.
> 
> The PCCard bus is fairly atrocious (basically ISA) but isn't that bad.
> I can get roughly wire speed from a 10baseT NIC without serious CPU
> strain on a P-233 laptop.
> 
> Have you tried anything other that FreeBSD 5.4 on your Tecra?



No, I haven't.  It is my primary laptop and I would prefer not to have
to load another OS merely for testing.


> >interrupt                          total       rate
> ...
> >irq11: cbb0 cbb1+++              6773905        173
> ...
> >          /0   /10  /20  /30  /40  /50  /60  /70  /80  /90  /100
> >cpu  user|XXXXX
> >     nice|
> >   system|X
> >interrupt|XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> >     idle|XXX
> ...


_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.