Re: 5-stable wpa_supplicant (Re: ral/wpa_supplicant drops after successful WPA negotiation?)

Eitarou Kamo <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile
Message-ID <[email protected]>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,


Brooks Davis wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 04, 2006 at 01:29:43AM +0900, Eitarou Kamo wrote:
>
>
>
> Because supporting WPA required incompatible changes to the
> in-kernel driver API and we don't make those in release branches
> without really good reason. Since 6.0 is much better than 5.x
> anyway, there was no justification for the disruption the merge
> would have caused.
>
> -- Brooks
>
 I see.....

Eitarou
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFECPfDuCrAEJBwrGwRAkI0AJ0ZQjGx7PhHsxy8zzTg4EQTYS+0YACdGNWB
/uE/bjUKOcqAxdCB4jeCMaE=
=GEdb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.