Re: kernel: ath0: device timeout

AT Matik <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile
Organization Infomatik
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Friday 28 April 2006 18:04, Sam Leffler wrote:
> > in my case it stopped when I compiled ath_rate_onoe instead of
> > rate_sample as well as I got much higher throughput and response times
>
> If changing the tx rate control algorithm really fixes it then that says
> sample may be handing back bogus rate codes.  Since I can't make this
> happen someone else needs to dig.
>
> As to better performance, onoe is not especially good and I do not
> recommend it.  However sample is too aggressive on up-shifting the tx
> rate and tends to vary the rate too quickly so can degrade performance
> when signal deteriorates.  I have done extensive testing of all the rate
> control algorithms as well as a proprietary one and chose sample as the
> default.  However none are anywhere near as effective as the proprietary
> one.
>

the proprietary one? You mean not compiling or loading any rate and let the 
card do the work by itself?

anyway, I would say if onoe is "good" or not depends on what this decision is 
based on

if onoe is lazier in up/down shifting the connextion speed it is probably a 
better choice in real life because in outdoor environments there we find 
conditions which may  continuously change the SNR and noise level and so it 
may cause troubles on a nervous rate shifter

Depends on what we want from this card this rate issue probably needs a 
general revision (this is not anything against you or your work) because it 
is certainly a difference if I run client mode, adhoc or hostap and so the 
rate decision must be different.

so probably a rate_sample as fast shifter is veru good and desireable when 
running in client mode but I am not so sure if this should be so in hostap 
and adhoc.

I believe that rate_sample shifts down and the rate is going to serve all 100 
conected clients in 1MB? Or how work this?

This new sysctl has to do with rate decision?

net.wlan.0.bmiss_max



João









A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura.
Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik  https://datacenter.matik.com.br
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.