Re: acpi_ibm(4): new radio kill switch (readonly) sysctl
"Rong-en Fan" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <6eb82e0704172055l5bddca81t5b7e9e45a297a839__32291.1378615119$1176868712$gmane$org@mail.gmail.com> |
On 4/18/07, Nate Lawson <[email protected]> wrote: > Rong-en Fan wrote: > > As pointed out by Henrik Brix Andersen, I adds a sysctl entry > > that shows the status of radio kill switch found on some ThinkPad: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/acpi_ibm_killswitch.diff > > > > dev.acpi_ibm.0.killswitch = 0 means the switch is off. It seems that > > no acpi event will be generated when the value changes (actually, > > my x60 does not generate any events when I presses FN+something). > > Otherwise, we can hook it in devd.conf and remove wireless driver when > > kill switch is on... > > > > Any comments? > > Seems fine to me. But as to the name of the sysctl -- it should be more > logical. How about renaming it to dev.acpi_ibm.0.radio_enable and when > 1, the radio is enabled? Even if you have to invert the logic of the > ACPI method, it would make more sense to users. They don't need to know > what's going on under the hood. Good idea. I updated the patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/acpi_ibm_radio_switch.diff If you have ThinkPad other than X60, please help test this. Thanks, Rong-En Fan > > -- > Nate > _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"