Re: fprint (finger print sensor framework) port ready for testing
Simon Barner <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20080415193836.GA1956__7060.53641993112$1208288426$gmane$org@dose.local.invalid> |
Vladimir Grebenschikov wrote: > As I understand, pam module requires user name first. > So there no way to make gdm/kdm/*dm just scan image, find apropriate > user and login him ? As far as I can tell, it currently is not supported, but somebody seems to work on it: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg00471.html > > ???Have you seen/reviewed security/bioapi and security/bsp_upektfmess > (later works only on RELENG_6 now) ? Yes. In the mean time, there even is a binary of the UPEK driver for FreeBSD 7 i386, but the pam module did not work for me. > > Looks like fprint ports are introduce one new bioapi ? Yes, but at it seems, the developers deliberated well about it: http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/FAQ#Why_no_BioAPI.3F -- Best regards / Viele Grüße, [email protected] Simon Barner [email protected]
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 187 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFIBQQ8Ckn+/eutqCoRAunAAJ9uPQeQz+jBdRN4RlECGDd5rdIghACcD0Kk NzXQmAdHBQ30mjakYwKUSuw= =bffc -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----