Re: [[email protected]: Re: fprint (finger print sensor framework) port ready for testing]

Ilya Bakulin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile
Organization HT-Systems
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 12:19:07 -0500
Richard Kolkovich <[email protected]> wrote:

> Forgot to reply to all...
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Richard Kolkovich <[email protected]> -----
> 
> Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 10:19:09 -0500
> From: Richard Kolkovich <[email protected]>
> To: Simon Barner <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: fprint (finger print sensor framework) port ready for testing
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
> 
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 08:07:40PM +0200, Simon Barner wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I did a port [2] of the fprint finger print sensor framework [1]
> > and would like to receive some feedback before I commit it.
> > 
> > It comes with a PAM module for finger print based authentication, a
> > graphical (fprint_demo) and a console (pam_fprint_enroll) application
> > for finger print enrollment.
> > 
> > I did my tests with the UPEK sensor found in Lenovo's T61.
> > 
> > Simon
> > 
> > (M'fup2 ports@)
> > 
> > [1] http://www.reactivated.net/fprint/wiki/Main_Page
> > [2] http://home.leo.org/~barner/freebsd/fprint.tar.gz
> > 
> > -- 
> > Best regards / Viele Gr??e,                             [email protected]
> >  Simon Barner                                                [email protected]
> 
> 
> Anyone had success with this on the T43p?  fprint_demo doesn't detect any devices.  The kernel sees it as follows:
> 
> ugen0: <STMicroelectronics Biometric Coprocessor, class 0/0, rev 1.00/0.01, addr 2> on uhub2
> 
> From the looks of it, the STM device is not supported by fprint, but I can't find anything online that confirms or denies this.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> -- 
> 
> Richard Kolkovich
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> 
> ----- End forwarded message -----
> 
> -- 
> 
> Richard Kolkovich
> [email protected]
> 
Just want to confirm, fprint-* ports work OK on Dell Vostro 1310:

ugen1: <STMicroelectronics Biometric Coprocessor, class 0/0, rev 1.00/0.01, addr 2> on uhub0

kibab@kibab-nb%usbdevs -v
Controller /dev/usb0:
addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00
 port 1 addr 2: full speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Biometric Coprocessor(0x2016), STMicroelectronics(0x0483), rev 0.01

After adding devfs rules and enrolling fingerprints PAM module works like a charm, thanks :-)
-- 
Ilya Bakulin <[email protected]>
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 195 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAki/eOcACgkQo9vlj1oadwg0KQCfYPymGggdbx71Cw54AqmmtLvM
L5IAnjpTlmwDL5WZ5axTLSEyngCTTSF4
=ot5c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.