Re: X60 overheating with 7.1

On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 12:13 -0500, George Neville-Neil wrote:
> On Jan 14, 2009, at 12:06 , Alexandre Sunny Kovalenko wrote:
> 
> >>
> > That thread forked and re-forked a few times under the different
> > subjects...
> >
> > Did you try setting
> >
> > hw.acpi.thermal.user_override=1
> > hw.acpi.thermal.tz1._PSV=75C
> >
> > in /etc/sysctl.conf?
> >
> Yes, that is now set and it keeps the machine from overheating BUT
> the machine bounces around alot when doing any real work, like a build.
> So the heat gets up to 80 then the CPU goes down to 125, then the heat  
> comes
> down etc.
I guess, we are down to expectations management here ;) I do no expect
1.83 GHz dualcore CPU, 3GB of RAM and 160GB of 5400RPM disk to be able
to run at the top performance within 4 lbs package for any protracted
period of time. I am quite happy with it doing -STABLE buildword under
hour-and-a-half and re-encoding DVD movies at ~250fps. Or building
OpenOffice.org under two days ;)

> > If not, we can start by comparing machines and configurations. Mine is
> > X60 (1709-something) with 1.83GHz "Core Not-2 Duo" which is 32-bit
> > machine and I am running i386 version of -STABLE on it. I seem to  
> > recall
> > that there are 64-bit capable X60 models out there as well and someone
> > was running amd64 flavor on it. What's yours?
> >
> 
> I am running i386 as well and I think our machines are identical.  
Judging by "2000/Something" you have mentioned below, I suspect not.

> I have tried powerd but, at least emprically, it seemed to cause
> the bouncing heat/CPU speed issue to be worse, that is, higher peaks  
> and troughs.
Just out of curiosity -- what are you using to visualize this? I was
tempted a few times to put something together, but never really sat down
to do it.

> It NEVER gets down to 40 except when I turn it on.  At idle the tz0  
> and tz1 are
> 60 and 62 respectively.
I shall turn off powerd and Cx levels later today and see what I get
than.

> 
> 
> > Are you setting Cx levels in rc.conf?
There are opinions whether doing C3 on one core (as I do) gains you
anything, but, I believe, there is general consensus about C2. In my
case, it seems to improve both battery life and heat dissipation.

> I think I have one higher level, 2000/something at the start.  I'll  
> look tonight
> or tomorrow.
That, likely means 2GHz processor, and AFAICR 64-bit capable to boot.

-- 
Alexandre "Sunny" Kovalenko (Олександр Коваленко)

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"