Re: Fighting for the power.

Nate Lawson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.acpi
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Ian Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 11 May 2009, Gary Dunn wrote:
>  > On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 02:13 +0300, Alexander Motin wrote:
>  > ...
>  > > 
>  > > What's about general effect, the main idea here is the same as in audio 
>  > > processing: result mostly depends on quality of the worst component. 
>  > > Your system may just have some other consumers which I don't have. For 
>  > > example, desktop CPU instead of mobile, desktop chipset instead of 
>  > > mobile, powerful external video instead of (or even in addition to) 
>  > > built-in, and so on.
>  > > 
>  > 
>  > Interesting point. Is there a power consumption benchmark for evaluating
>  > hardware for use with FreeBSD?
> 
> make buildworld, running on battery? :-)
> 
> More seriously: thanks to Nate's earlier niggling, I've been thinking 
> towards a richer set of power profiles than our {performance,economy} 
> dichotomy for a while, both in terms of various different work/play and 
> AC/battery scenarious, and re specific settings that may be more or less 
> optimal for particular hardware, that could be distributed or advised as 
> more of a basic working set rather than as a series of 'try this' hints.
> 

FYI, Cyrille Szymanski has implemented a patch to add this kind of power
profile support to powerd(8). I'd like to see it finished and committed.

-- 
Nate
_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.