Re: Plans for an online meeting regarding Radiotap
Mike Kershaw <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.linux.kernel.wireless.general,gmane.network.wireless.radiotap,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile,gmane.os.openbsd.misc,gmane.os.openbsd.tech,gmane.os.netbsd.devel.network,gmane.network.wireshark.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Kismet Wireless |
| Message-ID | <20090823142724.GA29917@drd1813> |
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 05:04:20PM +0200, G?bor Stefanik wrote: > > Besides, > > you're supposed to make at least two implementations when proposing a > > standard field. > > If I remember correctly, I made an implementation for the Linux kernel > (a generator-side implementation) and one for Wireshark (a parser-side > implementation). Or should I make two generator-side implementations > according to the requirement (e.g. one for Linux, another for > OpenBSD)? Once there's a spec that's a little more stable I can add it to lorcon, so that will give you 2 userspace implementations for tx (assuming aircrack adopts it) with different authors. -m -- Mike Kershaw/Dragorn <[email protected]> GPG Fingerprint: 3546 89DF 3C9D ED80 3381 A661 D7B2 8822 738B BDB1 "A baby seal walks into a club..."
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkqRUcwACgkQ17KIInOLvbHnEwCgtNpP2szed35FZIurTJJ+Ixix VqAAn2std79YDlBkC+scYtfesZA6BT+o =E+r3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----