Re: RFT: if_ath HAL refactoring
John Baldwin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile,gmane.os.freebsd.current |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Monday, September 20, 2010 10:06:53 am Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 20 September 2010 21:25, John Baldwin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Why not include this iff both 'device ath' and 'device pci' are included? > > That is what is normally done for bus-specific attachments. > > I've not idea right now whether there's an Atheros SoC with an > AHB-attached wireless device and a PCI bus. In fact, that won't work > at the present time because the device names would clash. Why would the device names clash? We have _lots_ of drivers with multiple bus attachments that use the same name regardless of which bus they are on, and making a bus attachment conditional on the bus being present is what every other driver that desires this level of granularity does. -- John Baldwin _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"