Re: Thinkpad T410: resume broken
Jan Henrik Sylvester <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.os.freebsd.current,gmane.os.freebsd.devel.mobile |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/16/2014 20:10, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Adrian Chadd <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> I wonder what changed between 9.2-RELEASE and 10.0-RELEASE. >> >> Please poke me about this next week. I'm busy this week with work and >> maker faire but I will try to help you later. >> >> (It's possible something like ACPI updates or a driver update has >> broken things.) >> >> >> -a >> > > Does your kernel include VESA? My T320 behaved as you describe until I > removed VESA from my kernel. I think using vt may also fix this without the > need to remove VESA, bug I have not gotten around to confirming this. (Sorry, this is more or less a lengthy "me, too":) I am observing exactly the same on my T510 (not surprisingly, as it is basically the same with a different screen size) using Nvidia (in contract to most other recent mailing list reports, which are using Intel). From 8.1-RELEASE to 9.2-RELEASE, suspend and resume used to work with a generic kernel (I like generic release kernels and freebsd-update) -- except for a short time, which was due to the Xorg port. Especially 9.X-RELEASE were really stable with all the hardware working after resume (maybe except firewire). After going to 10.0-RELEASE, resuming would briefly turn the screen on, but it would go back to black with the power LED continuing to blink (as it does while sleeping). After a while, I realized that I lost the non-default option ACPI_PM for x11/nvidia-driver installing 10.0. With ACPI_PM for x11/nvidia-driver, I had at least one resume with most of the hardware working: The screen was still unusable being static with colorful lines, but I could ssh into the machine over wireless. I have not had time to try 10-STABLE with vt, but from reading various reports on the lists, that is probably the only way. I hope there will be a vt enabled kernel on the 10.1-RELEAS media, if vt is going to be required even for configurations that would work just fine on 9.X (WITH_NEW_XORG=yes is very usable with x11/nvidia-driver even without vt). From what you said, you already have ACPI_PM for x11/nvidia-driver as it is listed on the wiki. Have you? Cheers, Jan Henrik _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"